Copper M&A Update Report — Copper Projects Review 2020

By 23 January 2020Reports

Following the hugely positive feedback we received from our copper report entitled ‘Copper M&A – The Cupboard is Nearly Bare’, published in November 2018, we have reviewed copper M&A activity in 2019 and updated the exploration projects section of the report. We previously concluded that the number of late-stage development copper projects that were likely candidates to be acquired was limited. Looking at the latest data, this situation has not significantly changed, and the amount of copper M&A activity in the market through 2019 was low.

Copper industry in better shape: Our previous report highlighted that the copper mining companies were generally in a better financial shape than they had been for some time and that some will have to undertake M&A in the near to medium term in order to refresh their development and exploration pipelines. This gave some optimism for a rise in M&A activity.

M&A opportunities limited: However, we also showed that the opportunities for M&A were limited because: many copper companies that are potential takeover targets have difficult shareholding structures; the number of quality asset disposals from existing copper producers is likely to be a lot lower than in the past; and there are a limited number of late-stage development copper projects with resources of greater than 3.0Mt contained copper that are likely candidates to be acquired.

Low number of M&A deals in 2019: Meanwhile, in 2019 the amount of copper M&A activity in the market has been low, and the market for the raising of finance for juniors has been difficult. In 2019 there were just 20 deals valued at US$3.89bn (>US$10m in value), compared with 28 in 2018 valued at US$11.56bn.

Current M&A opportunities: Some 14 months later we have reviewed the copper projects database within slightly revised parameters and find that there are now 64 development and exploration projects with resources of more than 2.5Mt contained copper and we believe that only 19 of these have the potential to involve third party M&A activity and we conclude that there are just five projects with a ‘High’ possibility of a third party involvement. These are: Cascabel, Los Helados, Viscachitas, Casino, and Santo Tomás. This has been based on our assessment of a number of factors, including economics, permitting, location and geography, resource quality, the structure of existing shareholders, and other project issues. This report also examines some of these factors in more detail.

Copper Price outlook more positive: The low level of M&A is partly a function of the factors highlighted above as well as the relatively lacklustre copper price in 2019 which has hit sentiment towards the sector and held back investment. This lack of investment is only likely to cause supply issues in the longer term. At the same time, the demand outlook remains positive. In the short term it is reported that copper demand in China has recently been particularly restrained following lower investment in the electrical grid system, property, and transportation sector and it is suggested that this could change in 2020. In the medium to longer term, copper demand is expected to rise significantly with increased demand for electric vehicles (EVs). Copper is a major component in EVs used in electric motors, batteries, inverters, wiring and in charging stations.

RFC Ambrian has a track record of over 30 years of providing independent corporate advisory and investment services to the global mining industry, from both a technical and financial perspective.

Research
David Bird
+44 (0)20 3440 6822
david.bird@rfcambrian.com

Corporate Broking
Charlie Cryer
+44 (0)20 3440 6834
charlie.cryer@rfcambrian.com

For the full 38page report please click here.

This document has been approved under section 21(1) of the FMSA 2000 by RFC Ambrian Limited (“RFC Ambrian”) for communication only to eligible counterparties and professional clients as those terms are defined by the rules of Financial Conduct Authority. Its contents are not directed at retail clients as RFC Ambrian does not provide investment advisory services to retail clients.
RFC Ambrian publishes this document as non-independent research which is a marketing communication under the Conduct of Business rules. It has not been prepared in accordance with the regulatory rules relating to independent research, nor is it subject to the prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. It does not constitute a personal recommendation and does not constitute an offer or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. Neither RFC Ambrian nor any of its directors, officers, employees or agents shall have any liability, howsoever arising, for any error or incompleteness of fact or opinion in it or lack of care in its preparation or publication; provided that this shall not exclude liability to the extent that this is impermissible under the law relating to financial services. All statements and opinions are made as of the date on the face of this document and are not held out as applicable thereafter. This document is intended for distribution only in those jurisdictions where RFC Ambrian is permitted to distribute its research. In particular, it is not intended for distribution in and is not directed as persons in the United States.
On the date of this document, RFC Ambrian, RFC Ambrian’s holding company, persons connected with it and their respective directors may have a long or short position in any of the investments mentioned in this document. RFC Ambrian is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated and authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority. RFC Ambrian is registered in England and Wales no. 4236075. Its registered office is at Octagon Point, 5 Cheapside, London EC2V 6AA.